Testing with the Kids

Click for full size image

This is a recent photo of the kids, in some kind of performing art on the living room floor. It looks like the girls prepared Isaac with some of their kid makeup.

Click for full size image

Here’s Isaac helping me tonight with a little renovation. For those who have seen our house, it’s the doorway from the dining room into the hallway toward the stairs and bathroom. The door frame is gone, and a good part of the wall is now gone as well. Some day, most of the wall will be replaced with some nice decorative louvres. (We just saw the new Pink Panther movie. Can you imagine Steve Martin’s pronunciation of that last word?)

An Advent Meditation

In the midst of earthly life
Snares of death surround us;
Who shall help us in the strife
Lest the Foe confound us?
Thou only, Lord, Thou only!
We mourn that we have greatly erred,
That our sins Thy wrath have stirred.
Holy and righteous God!
Holy and mighty God!
Holy and all merciful Savior!
Eternal Lord God!
Save us lest we perish
In the bitter pangs of death.
Have mercy, O Lord!

In the midst of death’s dark vale
Powers of hell o’ertake us.
Who will help when they assail,
Who secure will make us?
Thou only, Lord, Thou only!
Thy heart is moved with tenderness,
Pities us in our distress.
Holy and righteous God!
Holy and mighty God!
Holy and all merciful Savior!
Eternal Lord God!
Save us from the terror
Of the fiery pit of hell.
Have mercy, O Lord!

In the midst of utter woe
When our sins oppress us,
Where shall we for refuge go,
Where for grace to bless us?
To Thee, Lord Jesus, only!
Thy precious blood was shed to win
Full atonement for our sin.
Holy and righteous God!
Holy and mighty God!
Holy and all merciful Savior!
Eternal Lord God!
Lord, preserve and keep us
In the peace that faith can give.
Have mercy, O Lord!

Martin Luther, composite translation from Cyberhymnal

Fun with accents

This was more interesting to me than it may be for others, since my speech was learned in both Arizona and southeast Massachusetts, two accents that could hardly be more different. I remember making a conscious effort not to pick up the Massachusetts accent, because I thought it was goofy. (No offense intended to those who speak that way or live there.) But I went to school in Mass from 6th through 12th grade.

I’ve also lived in Wesconsin and Minnesota from 1990 until last year.
See what happened:

What American accent do you have?

Your Result: The West

Your accent is the lowest common denominator of American speech. Unless you’re a SoCal surfer, no one thinks you have an accent. And really, you may not even be from the West at all, you could easily be from Florida or one of those big Southern cities like Dallas or Atlanta.

The Midland
Boston
North Central
The Inland North
Philadelphia
The South
The Northeast
What American accent do you have?
Take More Quizzes

Thanks to Random Intolerance for the link.

Kristen Lawson Defense

Kristen Lawson is the wife of a friend and fellow pastor in Escondido, California. After calling 911 for help, she was arrested, arraigned, and charged. The charges were lessened since the arrest, but they have never seemed to have much factual support at all, if any, and seem contrary to Kristen’s character. I don’t think I’ve met Kristen yet, but I believe the descriptions of her character that I’ve heard from her family and through their church, which supports her fully.

Kristen’s lawyer seems to have some confidence of a positive outcome, but the Lawsons need money at this point to continue the defense. You can find more information at Norman Teigen’s blog. Norman has posted several updates, and I trust will continue to do so.

Wolf Time

Yesterday I finished reading Lars Walker’s book Wolf Time. Previously, I read his book Blood and Judgment. Both were worth the time to read. They may be categorized under something like science fiction or fantasy, but they are unlike anything I’ve read in either genre. Walker is a Lutheran living in Minnesota, and it shows. Though the stories are somewhat gritty in places, sin is not glorified. Instead, villains often receive appropriate consequences for their villainy, and the triune God is glorified as the story unfolds. In this age of pluralism and spiritual confusion, Walker sifts and sorts through many religious alternatives, letting their merits and weaknesses show in realistic fashion. Yet somehow he manages to distinguish Christianity from the rest mainly on the basis of the Gospel. It’s a refreshing thing to find in paperback.

These two books are also based upon some detailed scholarship mixed with a generous dose of creative license. Wolf Time particularly, reminded me of several things in Tolkien’s Silmarillion, and got me thinking that it would be interesting to read up a little on Norse mythology. That topic may not interest everyone, but I’ve been intrigued, now that these two Christian writers have put their gifts to work in a way that seems to reverberate between them. I probably won’t have the time to look into it, but Lars Walker’s book has proven stimulating.

Defining a Controversy

Here are some observations from a layman of logic, and a question. Responses from the better educated are welcome.

When there is a question in controversy, each party will have its own point of view about how the controversy ought to be defined or described. In our present culture, this might be taken to mean that everyone’s wrong, and the controversy is therefore pointless. This environment favors any party that seeks to escape culpability, or having some sort of power, wishes to retain it. After some amount of time, the mass of people lose interest in the “pointless” controversy, wishing only that it would go away. Without interest, the controverted question passes into oblivion unanswered. This makes it possible for those who should be held accountable to simply outlive the problem. Later, they can help write the history books about what happened and say anything they like.

Certainly, some controversies are pointless. The proper way to open an egg comes to mind. That does not mean that every controversy is pointless. The Council of Nicaea comes to mind, as well as the Reformation, the election controversy in the Norwegian Synod, and the battle for the Bible in the 20th Century. Yet in every controversy, there are those who say it’s not worth fighting about. The fighting itself, they say, is worse than living with the disagreement.

Lilliput is a long way from here. Maybe that’s why I don’t care about the opening of eggs. But Nicaea is also a long way from here, in both time and distance. I care deeply about that controversy, and would hope to suffer great pain and even death before retracting my confession that Jesus Christ is of one substance with the Father. So, distance alone does not account for apathy.

What may explain our reactions to various controversies is simply how they are defined. Was Athanasius arguing about a single letter and nothing more? That’s how some defined the controversy. So the Formula of Concord, which settled a number of controversies among Lutherans, was careful to define each one in a fair and accurate way. It avoided unnecessary embarrassment to those who had been wrong, but did not hesitate to repeat the Bible’s judgment upon all of the controverted questions, or to leave undecided what did not already have an answer in holy scripture. We can learn a lot from the Formula.

Now for the question.

When someone is making an argument in a controversy, he wants it to be understood. So he describes the context for his argument, which includes a definition of the controversy itself, from his own point of view. That’s fair enough. His opponents owe him the courtesy of hearing the argument in its proper context, and evaluating its merit accordingly.

When someone is trying to win a controversy with a weak argument, he will expend great energy trying to redefine the controversy in a way that favors his own argument. In this way the weak argument may eventually prevail upon the strength of the skewed understanding of the controversy that has saturated the minds of most participants, instead of upon the strength of the argument itself. So how does one tell the difference between this strategy, when you see it, and the regular practice, which simply expresses an argument in its proper context?

This is a question that deserves some attention. One way to tell the difference is to observe how the participants in the controversy treat their opponents, and how they handle the arguments of their opponents. If the strategy, in responding, is to distract others from the opponents’ argument (perhaps with an attack on the opponent himself), then the party may plan to redefine the controversy to hide a weak argument. Likewise, if one party tries to shout his opponent down, perhaps by controlling or manipulating the media outlets, he may intend to redefine the controversy to help his weak argument. If one party tries to exclude or disqualify or otherwise to remove his opponent from the debate, then he may intend to redefine the controversy in favor of his weaker argument.

I’m sure that others can think of even better ways to answer the question.

A Long-Time Favorite Play

Though I went to public schools, I did learn quite a few useful things there. One that stuck with me was a play by Henrik Ibsen. I think my teacher spent more time on the play A Doll’s House, but my favorite was Enemy of the People. It’s a frustrating story to read, but I knew it for an accurate depiction of human nature as it plays out in real life. Wikipedia has a summary of the play that seems a little bit too Marxist. I liked the summary at SparkNotes better, but it’s all too brief. You can get the full text of the play (It’s not a long one.) at Project Gutenberg. I’ll copy below part of an especially poignant scene, in case you don’t have the time to read the whole play. If you read it, you may wish to read a synopsis first, so you better understand the context.

Disclaimer: Any similarity between the characters in Ibsen’s play and people in real life is no doubt entirely intentional and possibly even prophetic. Continue reading “A Long-Time Favorite Play”

Vacation

We’ve been on vacation for the past couple of weeks now. It’s been a nice vacation and high adventure, in its own way.

We began by camping at Crater Lake. It’s a big lake, almost inaccessible inside what’s left of a very large mountain in southern Oregon. The water is uniquely blue and clear. There is only one way to hike down to the water. At least, only one sanctioned way. It’s supposed to be a fairly challenging hike, especially on the way back, so we couldn’t do it with the kids. But we checked out quite a bit of the scenery, and the girls were able to become “Junior Rangers.” That’s something the National Park Service does. I’ll upload a picture with this post so you can see a bit of the lake. There may be a little smoke or haze in the picture from the fires burning to the west of Crater Lake.

The girls and Wizard Island

After Crater Lake, we took two days to travel to Phoenix, where we visited with Ingrid, Jacob, and Joshua, as well as Nancy and Parker. Then we visited with Lee, Laura, Ginger and Farah, as well as Duane, Alix, and Pollyann. (Please excuse any misspellings. My proofreader isn’t present at the moment.) We attended church in Phoenix, and I’ll post more about that later.

After visiting with Grandpa Tom and Jackie, and then Liz, we went to Andy and Tara’s house in the Verde Valley. It was a great time, and relaxing. It was also great to see Tagen, Jaxx, Gaberien, and Marie (Tiny), known to the girls, with great affection, as “the Rimrock Cousins.” Unfortunately, their horse was very sick, but the girls got to milk the goats and swim in the pool. (Sonja read in a book that milking goats’ milk is especially rich.)

From there we went further north to visit with Kirsten, Kirstie, and Caleb. We had dinner with Bestemor and Grandpa Larry, staying with them before heading north again. The real twist in the trip was that we picked up the stomach flu when we first arrived in Phoenix, and it went from Eva to Isaac to Sonja to Erica to Jesse, not quite finishing by the time we were supposed to leave Arizona. So again, we’d like to thank everyone for their hospitality and help that we received on the way.

Connectivity problems

Last Friday, our Internet connection was inexplicably down. Ironically, this happened just after we received our ISP bill. Well, that kind of thing, though rare, is unavoidable, so I waited to see if it would get fixed. Saturday morning, it was running again… until 10:00. From that time until this morning, the Plucked Chicken was locked in the coop. For the thousands of people (heh) who were disappointed at not finding the PC online, I apologize. For those who are on various mailing lists I’m hosting, I really hope it doesn’t happen again.

It turned out that something fried on the other end of our DSL link. It’s nice when it wasn’t really my fault, but unfortunate when it happens at the beginning of the weekend, and I can’t prove it to the ISP’s weekend skeleton crew on tech support.

Well, the bird is out of the coop. Maybe I’ll find something interesting to post.